Skip to content
English

Switch theme

Social sciences · OECD FoS 5.2 · China MoE 0201 理论经济学 / 0202 应用经济学

Economics

经济学

L1Assistive → Steady Score 1.30 · Last reviewed 2026-10-22 · Next review 2027-01-19

BIGGEST BREAKTHROUGH 2026-09-28 AI · majorField · major

NBER w35782: an LLM workflow that reproduces, improves and extends published economics research ↗

AI takes on replication and extension

Why this level

Stays L1 (close to L2): ML causal inference and text methods are common and a 2026 NBER paper uses an LLM workflow to reproduce and extend published work, but a 74-country Nature Human Behaviour study shows simulated LLM respondents are weak proxies for human preferences; no recognised AI-key discovery yet.

Research method 2Scientific discovery 1Practitioner adoption 1Education & curriculum 1
Research method ×0.32/4

ML causal inference and text-as-data methods are in mainstream empirical work; LLM workflows have started reproducing papers (NBER 2026) · source ↗

Scientific discovery ×0.351/4

No recognised economics discovery in which AI is essential; LLM ‘subjects’ proved only weak proxies for human preferences · source ↗

Practitioner adoption ×0.251/4

No survey of use among economists

Education & curriculum ×0.11/4

No course evidence found

S = 0.30·method + 0.35·discovery + 0.25·adoption + 0.10·education (education scores 0 when there is no evidence; if empty, the other weights are renormalised)

Sources

Composite 0.75–1.49: AI is an aid in parts of research or practice, with cases or surveys, but no recognised AI-key result. All levels →

Research directions

LLM-simulated agentsText as dataAI labour-market impact (as subject)

Papers

Milestones 7

Big glowing nodes are leaps: AI leap cool · Field leap warm · double ring = both

  1. Paper

    74-country study: LLM answers are weak proxies for human economic preferences

    74-country evidence that simulations are weak proxies

    Nature Human Behaviour
  2. Paper

    NBER: The Early Impacts of AI on Employment among Recent College Graduates — no significant rise in summer 2026 (w35796)

    AI: targets the group thought most exposed. Field: DiD and event-study find no relative rise, even with an expanded unemployment measure (working paper)

    NBER
  3. Paper

    Generative AI at Work: 14% productivity gain, largest for novices (QJE)

    Among first top-journal estimates of generative-AI productivity

    Quarterly Journal of Economics
  4. Paper

    “Homo Silicus”: LLMs as simulated economic agents (ACM EC 2024)

    LLMs as simulated economic agents

    ACM ECTo be verified
  5. Paper

    Korinek: Generative AI for economic research (JEL)

    Authoritative review of LLMs in economic research

    Journal of Economic Literature
  6. Paper

    Noy & Zhang: experimental evidence on generative AI productivity in writing tasks (Science)

    First top-journal RCT of generative AI productivity in knowledge work

    Science
More papers & repos 5

Latest news 10

  1. The new economics of enterprise AI
    MIT Technology Review - AIen
  2. NBER w35782
    NBERen

Data updated: AI × disciplines(UTC+8)