Skip to content
English

Switch theme

Social sciences · OECD FoS 5.3 · China MoE 0401 教育学

Education

教育学

L2Local breakthroughs ↑ Rising Score 2.10 · Last reviewed 2026-10-21 · Next review 2027-01-19

BIGGEST BREAKTHROUGH 2025-06-03 AI · majorField · major

Harvard physics RCT: AI tutoring beats active learning (Scientific Reports) ↗

RCT: AI-tutor learning gains about double active learning

Why this level

RCT evidence is arriving: a Harvard physics AI tutor beat active-learning classes (Sci. Rep. 2025); a 2026 NBER two-year Khanmigo trial found ~0.06–0.08 SD/year maths gains, with low engagement.

Research method 2Scientific discovery 2Practitioner adoption 2Education & curriculum 3
Research method ×0.32/4

Randomised controlled trials have begun systematically evaluating AI tutors · source ↗

Scientific discovery ×0.352/4

A Harvard AI-tutor trial and an NBER Khanmigo trial show positive effects, but there is also evidence of no effect or harm · source ↗

Practitioner adoption ×0.252/4

Student use is widespread; school-level adoption varies

Education & curriculum ×0.13/4

China’s Ministry of Education is pushing AI education in schools, aiming for near-universal coverage by 2030 · source ↗

S = 0.30·method + 0.35·discovery + 0.25·adoption + 0.10·education (education scores 0 when there is no evidence; if empty, the other weights are renormalised)

Sources

Composite 1.5–2.49: at least one peer-reviewed/officially verified AI-key result, or one dimension at 3; routine workflow largely unchanged. All levels →

Research directions

AI tutorsAdaptive practiceAutomated grading & feedback

Papers

Milestones 6

Big glowing nodes are leaps: AI leap cool · Field leap warm · double ring = both

  1. Paper

    NBER: two-year Khanmigo school experiment

    Two-year school trial, ~0.06–0.08 SD/yr

    NBERTo be verified
  2. Paper

    NBER: AI tutoring in mastery-based maths practice (6,000+ students)

    6,000+ student tutoring experiment

    NBERTo be verified
  3. Paper

    Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning (PNAS)

    Practice gains vanish and exam scores drop 17% after removal

    PNAS
  4. Paper

    Harvard physics RCT: AI tutoring beats active learning (Scientific Reports)

    RCT: AI-tutor learning gains about double active learning

    Scientific Reports
More papers & repos 3

Latest news 12

Data updated: AI × disciplines(UTC+8)