arXiv 2610.11942 · cs.CV · 2026-10-08
Right Screen, Wrong Transition: World Models as Verifiers for GUI Agents
Jiaming Zhang, Xuan Wang, Fuyao Zhang, Yang Cao, Lingjuan Lyu, Wei Yang Bryan Lim
Affiliation unverified
In latest · #118 Added on 2026-10-24
One-line takeaway
For GUI agents, safety is a property of transitions, not screens: a login page after tapping Sign in is fine, after View order it is an attack. LGWM, a decoder-free action-conditioned world model trained on 1.85M real GUI transitions, predicts the next screen's representation so verification is a vector comparison — 0.987 AUC at 17 ms on RSWT-BENCH, on par with the strongest closed VLMs.
GUI agent 的安全取决于“状态转移”而不只是当前屏幕:点“登录”后出现登录页正常,点“查看订单”后出现登录页就是攻击。LGWM 是不带解码器、按动作条件直接预测下一屏表示的世界模型,用 185 万条真实 GUI 转移训练,验证只需向量比较;在 RSWT-BENCH 上免训练打分 AUC 0.987、每次 17 毫秒,与最强闭源 VLM 相当。
Read on arXiv PDF Hugging Face discussion Code Project page
Topics & disciplines
More on Agents
- Raven: The Harness of Harnesses for Composable Agentic Intelligence ▲748
- False Frontiers: Diagnosing and Mitigating Co-Cheating in Self-Evolving Search Agents ▲642
- Omni-IO Skills: Harnessing Your Agent Omni-Native ▲485
- BizAgentBench: Unveiling Hidden Challenges in Deploying Long-Horizon Agents for Real-World Business ▲388
- Player-1: Learning to Play from Synthetic Experience ▲347
More on Safety & interpretability
- Post-Training Leaves Behavioral Shadows on Unrelated Decisions 2026-09-24 · ▲273
- S-Space: Exploring Spatial Workspace in Multimodal Language Models 2026-10-09 · ▲270
- Behavioral Compositionality of Sparse Autoencoder Representations 2026-10-15 · ▲108
- DecepEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Deception in LLM Agents 2026-10-06 · ▲85
- Last Secure Code Benchmark: Is the Code You Vibe Secure? 2026-10-10 · ▲76
About this data
Metadata from the arXiv API (verified); upvotes from Hugging Face Daily Papers; citations from Semantic Scholar. Last refreshed 2026-10-26.
The takeaway is written by AIMap from the abstract; the abstract itself is not reproduced — read the original.