Skip to content
English

Switch theme

Tool use & agents · %

BFCL v4 (function calling)

Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: single, parallel and multi-turn tool calls, web search, memory and relevance detection.

Active Contamination risk: Medium 107 results · 80 models Updated Oct 22, 2026 Newest result: 2026-10-17 Official leaderboard ↗

What it measures

Overall accuracy across categories; FC = native function calling, Prompt = tool calls via prompting.

Limitations

AST matching can mark valid alternative calls as wrong; leaderboard updates are periodic.

Contamination risk: Medium

Public test data.

Leaderboard

80 models

# Model Provider Score Rank Setting Source type Date
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 77.5% 1 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Claude-Opus-4-5-20251101 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
2 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Anthropic 73.2% 2 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Claude-Sonnet-4-5-20250929 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
3 Gemini 3 Pro Google 72.5% 3 Overall accuracy; prompt-based“Gemini-3-Pro-Preview (Prompt)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
4 GLM-4.6OW Zhipu AI (Z.ai) 72.4% 4 Overall accuracy“GLM-4.6 (FC thinking)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
5 Grok 4.1 fast xAI 69.6% 5 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Grok-4-1-fast-reasoning (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
6 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 68.7% 6 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Claude-Haiku-4-5-20251001 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
7 o3 OpenAI 63.0% 8 Overall accuracy; prompt-based“o3-2025-04-16 (Prompt)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
8 Grok 4 xAI 63.0% 9 Overall accuracy; prompt-based“Grok-4-0709 (Prompt)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
9 Moonshotai-Kimi-K2-InstructOW Moonshot AI 59.1% 11 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Moonshotai-Kimi-K2-Instruct (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
10 Command A ReasoningOW Cohere 57.1% 13 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Command A Reasoning (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
11 DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp (Prompt + Thinking)OW DeepSeek 56.7% 14 Overall accuracy Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
12 Gemini 2.5 Flash (Jun 2025) Google 56.2% 15 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Gemini-2.5-Flash (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
13 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 55.9% 16 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“GPT-5.2-2025-12-11 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
14 GPT-5 mini OpenAI 55.5% 17 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“GPT-5-mini-2025-08-07 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
15 xLAM-2-32b-fc-rOW Salesforce 54.7% 18 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“xLAM-2-32b-fc-r (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
16 DeepSeek-V3.2-ExpOW DeepSeek 54.1% 19 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
17 GPT-4.1 OpenAI 54.0% 20 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“GPT-4.1-2025-04-14 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
18 o4-mini OpenAI 53.2% 21 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“o4-mini-2025-04-16 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
19 xLAM-2-70b-fc-rOW Salesforce 53.1% 22 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“xLAM-2-70b-fc-r (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
20 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct (Jul 2025)OW Alibaba (Qwen) 52.1% 23 Overall accuracy; prompt-based“Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 (Prompt)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
21 GPT-5 nano OpenAI 51.5% 24 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“GPT-5-nano-2025-08-07 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
22 Nanbeige4-3B-Thinking-2511OW Nanbeige 51.4% 25 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Nanbeige4-3B-Thinking-2511 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
23 GPT-4.1 mini OpenAI 50.5% 27 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“GPT-4.1-mini-2025-04-14 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
24 Qwen3-32BOW Alibaba (Qwen) 48.7% 29 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Qwen3-32B (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
25 Nanbeige3.5-Pro-ThinkingOW Nanbeige 47.7% 32 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Nanbeige3.5-Pro-Thinking (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
26 xLAM-2-8b-fc-rOW Salesforce 46.7% 34 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“xLAM-2-8b-fc-r (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
27 BitAgent-Bounty-8BOW Bittensor 46.2% 36 Overall accuracy Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
28 Arch-Agent-32BOW katanemo 45.4% 37 Overall accuracy Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
29 Qwen3-8BOW Alibaba (Qwen) 42.6% 39 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Qwen3-8B (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
30 ToolACE-2-8BOW Huawei Noah & USTC 42.4% 40 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“ToolACE-2-8B (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
31 Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct (Jul 2025)OW Alibaba (Qwen) 41.4% 41 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
32 xLAM-2-3b-fc-rOW Salesforce 41.2% 42 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“xLAM-2-3b-fc-r (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
33 Qwen3-14BOW Alibaba (Qwen) 41.0% 43 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Qwen3-14B (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
34 Mistral Large 2 (Nov 2024)OW Mistral AI 38.4% 46 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“mistral-large-2411 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
35 Mistral Medium 3 Mistral AI 37.7% 48 Overall accuracy“Mistral-Medium-2505” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
36 Llama 4 MaverickOW Meta 37.3% 50 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct-FP8 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
37 Mistral Small 3.2OW Mistral AI 37.1% 51 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Mistral-small-2506 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
38 Gemini-2.5-Flash-Lite Google 36.9% 52 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Gemini-2.5-Flash-Lite (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
39 qwen3-4b-instruct-2507OW Alibaba (Qwen) 35.7% 54 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
40 Arch-Agent-3BOW katanemo 35.4% 56 Overall accuracy Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
41 GPT-4.1 nano OpenAI 33.0% 58 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“GPT-4.1-nano-2025-04-14 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
42 Arch-Agent-1.5BOW katanemo 32.1% 60 Overall accuracy Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
43 Command R7BOW Cohere 32.1% 61 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Command R7B (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
44 Llama 3.3 70BOW Meta 31.9% 62 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
45 Hammer2.1-7bOW MadeAgents 31.7% 64 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Hammer2.1-7b (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
46 xLAM-2-1b-fc-rOW Salesforce 30.4% 65 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“xLAM-2-1b-fc-r (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
47 Gemma 3 12BOW Google 30.4% 66 Overall accuracy; prompt-based“Gemma-3-12b-it (Prompt)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
48 Hammer2.1-3bOW MadeAgents 29.7% 68 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Hammer2.1-3b (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
49 Gemma 3 27BOW Google 29.5% 69 Overall accuracy; prompt-based“Gemma-3-27b-it (Prompt)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
50 Phi-4OW Microsoft Research 28.8% 70 Overall accuracy; prompt-based“Phi-4 (Prompt)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
51 Qwen3-1.7BOW Alibaba (Qwen) 28.4% 71 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Qwen3-1.7B (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
52 Llama 4 ScoutOW Meta 28.1% 72 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
53 CoALM-70BOW UIUC + Oumi 28.0% 74 Overall accuracy Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
54 Hammer2.1-1.5bOW MadeAgents 27.9% 75 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Hammer2.1-1.5b (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
55 Palmyra-X-004 Writer 27.9% 76 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“palmyra-x-004 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
56 Mistral NeMoOW Mistral AI 27.6% 78 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Open-Mistral-Nemo-2407 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
57 Amazon-Nova-2-Lite-v1:0 Amazon 27.1% 80 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Amazon-Nova-2-Lite-v1:0 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
58 Granite-3.1-8B-InstructOW IBM 27.1% 81 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Granite-3.1-8B-Instruct (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
59 Falcon3-10B-InstructOW TII UAE 27.0% 82 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Falcon3-10B-Instruct (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
60 Granite-3.2-8B-InstructOW IBM 26.9% 83 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Granite-3.2-8B-Instruct (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
61 CoALM-8BOW UIUC + Oumi 26.8% 84 Overall accuracy Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
62 Llama 3.1-8BOW Meta 25.8% 85 Overall accuracy; prompt-based“Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (Prompt)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
63 MiniCPM3-4B-FCOW openbmb 25.6% 86 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“MiniCPM3-4B-FC (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
64 Amazon Nova Pro Amazon 25.0% 88 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Amazon-Nova-Pro-v1:0 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
65 Falcon3-7B-InstructOW TII UAE 24.0% 91 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Falcon3-7B-Instruct (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
66 Qwen3-0.6BOW Alibaba (Qwen) 23.9% 92 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Qwen3-0.6B (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
67 Granite-20b-FunctionCallingOW IBM 23.2% 93 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Granite-20b-FunctionCalling (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
68 Amazon Nova Micro Amazon 22.3% 95 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Amazon-Nova-Micro-v1:0 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
69 RZN-TOW Phronetic AI 22.3% 96 Overall accuracy; prompt-based“RZN-T (Prompt)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
70 Llama-3.2-3B-InstructOW Meta 21.9% 98 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
71 Bielik-11B-v2.3-InstructOW SpeakLeash & ACK Cyfronet AGH 21.9% 99 Overall accuracy; prompt-based“Bielik-11B-v2.3-Instruct (Prompt)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
72 Hammer2.1-0.5bOW MadeAgents 21.2% 100 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Hammer2.1-0.5b (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
73 Gemma 3 4BOW Google 19.6% 101 Overall accuracy; prompt-based“Gemma-3-4b-it (Prompt)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
74 granite-4.0-350mOW IBM 19.0% 103 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Granite-4.0-350m (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
75 Falcon3-3B-InstructOW TII UAE 16.3% 104 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Falcon3-3B-Instruct (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
76 Ministral 8BOW Mistral AI 11.1% 105 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
77 Falcon3-1B-InstructOW TII UAE 11.1% 106 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Falcon3-1B-Instruct (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
78 Llama 3.2 1BOW Meta 10.8% 107 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
79 Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1OW NVIDIA 10.0% 108 Overall accuracy; native function calling (FC)“Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1 (FC)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026
80 Gemma 3 1BOW Google 7.2% 109 Overall accuracy; prompt-based“Gemma-3-1b-it (Prompt)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026

Data sources & licences

SourceLicence / termsHow we reuse itLast fetched
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)
Gorilla / BFCL team, UC Berkeley
Apache-2.0 (gorilla repo) Open licence – full data with attribution Oct 22, 2026
← All benchmarks · Learn how benchmarks work

FAQ

What does BFCL v4 (function calling) measure?

Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: single, parallel and multi-turn tool calls, web search, memory and relevance detection. Overall accuracy across categories; FC = native function calling, Prompt = tool calls via prompting.

How reliable is BFCL v4 (function calling)?

AST matching can mark valid alternative calls as wrong; leaderboard updates are periodic. Contamination risk: Medium – Public test data.

Data updated: Benchmarks(UTC+8)