Skip to content
English

Switch theme

Meta

Llama 3.1-8B benchmark results

8 results on 8 benchmarks from 5 sources.

Open weights Released: Jul 23, 2024 Updated Oct 22, 2026 API prices & specs →

Also listed as: llama-3.1-8b-instruct · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct · Llama 3.1 Instruct Turbo (8B) · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (Prompt) · Llama-3.1-8B · meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct · meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B

All benchmark results

Benchmarks Score Rank Setting Source type Date
LMArena Text 1211 341 Overall, style control on; 49605 votes; 95% CI 1207–1215“llama-3.1-8b-instruct” Official leaderboard Oct 8, 2026
Open LLM Leaderboard v2 23.8% 1905 Average of 6 normalised benchmarks; float16; 8.03B params“meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct” Official leaderboard Mar 13, 2025
GPQA Diamond 27.0% 270 Epoch AI run, accuracy Independent run Aug 27, 2026
MMLU 56.1% 76 Exact match; 5-shot Official leaderboard via Epoch AI Jul 23, 2024
MMLU-Pro 36.6% 204 Overall accuracy; data source: TIGER-Lab; 8B“Llama-3.1-8B” Official leaderboard Mar 11, 2026
AIME (OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025) 1.7% 253 Epoch AI run, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 Independent run Aug 27, 2026
MATH Level 5 22.9% 84 Epoch AI run, accuracy Independent run Jan 27, 2025
BFCL v4 (function calling) 25.8% 85 Overall accuracy; prompt-based“Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (Prompt)” Official leaderboard Oct 17, 2026

Related on this site

← AI Model Benchmarks

FAQ

Where do these Llama 3.1-8B scores come from?

From Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL), LMArena leaderboard dataset, MMLU-Pro leaderboard (TIGER-Lab), and Hugging Face Open LLM Leaderboard v2 (archived). Each row links to the original leaderboard, dataset or report, and vendor-reported numbers are labelled.

Data updated: Benchmarks(UTC+8)