Skip to content
English

Switch theme

Meta

Llama 3.1-70B benchmark results

7 results on 7 benchmarks from 4 sources.

Open weights Released: Jul 23, 2024 Updated Oct 22, 2026

Also listed as: llama-3.1-70b-instruct · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct · Llama 3.1 Instruct Turbo (70B) · Llama-3.1-70B · meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct · meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B

All benchmark results

Benchmarks Score Rank Setting Source type Date
LMArena Text 1293 287 Overall, style control on; 55240 votes; 95% CI 1290–1297“llama-3.1-70b-instruct” Official leaderboard Oct 8, 2026
Open LLM Leaderboard v2 43.4% 62 Average of 6 normalised benchmarks; bfloat16; 70.554B params“meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct” Official leaderboard Mar 13, 2025
GPQA Diamond 44.2% 228 Epoch AI run, accuracy Independent run Jan 27, 2025
MMLU 80.1% 17 Exact match; 5-shot Official leaderboard via Epoch AI Jul 23, 2024
MMLU-Pro 52.5% 160 Overall accuracy; data source: TIGER-Lab; 70B“Llama-3.1-70B” Official leaderboard Mar 11, 2026
AIME (OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025) 3.6% 241 Epoch AI run, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 Independent run Feb 25, 2025
MATH Level 5 36.7% 75 Epoch AI run, accuracy Independent run Jan 27, 2025
← AI Model Benchmarks

FAQ

Where do these Llama 3.1-70B scores come from?

From Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, LMArena leaderboard dataset, MMLU-Pro leaderboard (TIGER-Lab), and Hugging Face Open LLM Leaderboard v2 (archived). Each row links to the original leaderboard, dataset or report, and vendor-reported numbers are labelled.

Data updated: Benchmarks(UTC+8)