Skip to content
English

Switch theme

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8 benchmark results

10 results on 7 benchmarks from 3 sources.

Closed Released: May 28, 2026 Updated Oct 22, 2026 API prices & specs →

Also listed as: claude-opus-4-8-high · claude-opus-4-8 · claude-opus-4-8_none · claude-opus-4-8_low · claude-opus-4-8_max · Claude Opus 4.8 (max)

All benchmark results

Benchmarks Score Rank Setting Source type Date
LMArena Text 1481 25 Overall, style control on; 64177 votes; 95% CI 1478–1485“claude-opus-4-8-high” Official leaderboard Oct 8, 2026
LMArena Text 1474 40 Overall, style control on; 65259 votes; 95% CI 1470–1478“claude-opus-4-8” Official leaderboard Oct 8, 2026
LMArena WebDev 1556 37 Overall; 18534 votes; 95% CI 1550–1562“claude-opus-4-8-high” Official leaderboard Oct 8, 2026
LMArena WebDev 1536 46 Overall; 17435 votes; 95% CI 1530–1541“claude-opus-4-8” Official leaderboard Oct 8, 2026
LMArena Vision 1286 17 Overall, style control on; 18350 votes; 95% CI 1280–1293“claude-opus-4-8-high” Official leaderboard Oct 2, 2026
LMArena Vision 1279 26 Overall, style control on; 18857 votes; 95% CI 1273–1286“claude-opus-4-8” Official leaderboard Oct 2, 2026
GPQA Diamond 85.3% 82 Epoch AI run, accuracy Independent run Aug 6, 2026
AIME (OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025) 84.4% 95 Epoch AI run, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 Independent run Aug 6, 2026
OSWorld 2.0 20.6% 7 Binary accuracy; 500 steps; reasoning: max Official leaderboard via Epoch AI May 28, 2026
τ²-bench 39.7% 8 banking_knowledge domain, pass^1; effort: max; submitted by Sierra; v1.0.1 Official leaderboard Jul 23, 2026
← AI Model Benchmarks

FAQ

Where do these Claude Opus 4.8 scores come from?

From Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, LMArena leaderboard dataset, and τ²-bench leaderboard submissions. Each row links to the original leaderboard, dataset or report, and vendor-reported numbers are labelled.

Data updated: Benchmarks(UTC+8)