Skip to content
English

Switch theme

Zhipu AI (Z.ai)

GLM-5 benchmark results

12 results on 8 benchmarks from 5 sources.

Open weights Released: Feb 11, 2026 Updated Oct 22, 2026 API prices & specs →

Also listed as: glm-5 · GLM 5 · GLM 5 (high)

All benchmark results

Benchmarks Score Rank Setting Source type Date
LMArena Text 1458 63 Overall, style control on; 29292 votes; 95% CI 1453–1462“glm-5” Official leaderboard Oct 8, 2026
LMArena WebDev 1434 79 Overall; 7506 votes; 95% CI 1426–1443“glm-5” Official leaderboard Oct 8, 2026
GPQA Diamond 87.8% 66 Epoch AI run, accuracy Independent run Feb 12, 2026
MMLU-Pro 86.0% 29 Overall accuracy; data source: Self-Reported; 754B Vendor-reported Mar 11, 2026
SWE-bench Verified 72.1% 22 Epoch AI run (Epoch scaffold) Independent run Feb 15, 2026
SWE-bench Verified 72.8% 16 agent: mini-SWE-agent“glm-5” Official leaderboard Feb 17, 2026
AIME (OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025) 80.0% 110 Epoch AI run, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 Independent run Feb 12, 2026
τ²-bench 82.5% 3 airline domain, pass^1; effort: enabled; submitted by Sierra; v1.0.1 Official leaderboard Feb 27, 2026
τ²-bench 9.8% 27 banking_knowledge domain, pass^1; effort: enabled; submitted by Sierra; v1.0.1 Official leaderboard Feb 27, 2026
τ²-bench 73.7% 20 retail domain, pass^1; effort: enabled; submitted by Sierra; v1.0.1 Official leaderboard Feb 27, 2026
τ²-bench 86.8% 13 telecom domain, pass^1; effort: enabled; submitted by Sierra; v1.0.1 Official leaderboard Feb 27, 2026
Terminal-Bench 2.0 52.4% 64 Terminal-Bench 2.0; agent: Terminus 2 Official leaderboard via Epoch AI Feb 11, 2026
← AI Model Benchmarks

FAQ

Where do these GLM-5 scores come from?

From Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, LMArena leaderboard dataset, MMLU-Pro leaderboard (TIGER-Lab), SWE-bench leaderboards (swebench.com), and τ²-bench leaderboard submissions. Each row links to the original leaderboard, dataset or report, and vendor-reported numbers are labelled.

Data updated: Benchmarks(UTC+8)